Friday, July 25, 2003


Regarding the Northeast revolution against the Bush stance on the un-Greening of the world, Mr. Cheney says that the reason we had to take out the Saddam regime was because somewhere in the future they might have developed nuclear capabilities. Then why aren't the administration worrying about the global ecology? At least "somewhere in the future" we may make the planet uninhabitable for animal life as we know it, sooner rather than later if we don't start husbanding our resources. Why aren't we pushing for wind, solar, wave and any other sources of renewable energy, "clean" transportation, etc., I ask, rhetorically?